Saner Cloud Posture Management
Cloud posture, translated into fix-ready priorities
Saner CSPM tracks posture across AWS, Azure, and GCP against benchmark-driven controls, surfaces pass, fail, unchecked, and not evaluated states, and helps teams move from control gaps to guided remediation with account and region context.

How it works
Powered by SecPod & USI
Saner Cloud Security Posture Management runs on a preventive framework built to spot posture drift early. It shines a light on misconfigurations, exposures, and control gaps as they appear. Then it guides the next action, so risk drops before it turns into an incident.
Your first 30 days with Saner
From deployment to measurable risk reduction — here is what to expect.

100% Visibility / 85% reduction in unmanaged assets
Every asset is accounted for from the moment Saner deploys. You get complete visibility into shadow assets and rogue endpoints that were invisible to your team.
75% Reduction in Operational Complexity
Siloed tools, manual handoffs, and fragmented workflows are replaced by a single platform that handles scanning, assessment, prioritization, and patching in one place.
1,000+ posture checks working in the background
Saner CSPM runs frequent posture scans using a security ruleset of over 1,000 checks, continuously assessing services like IAM roles and virtual networks for violations, exposure, and security drift. The result is a posture that stays visible, measurable, and harder to misplace.
Key Features
Everything you need to stay ahead of threats.
Benchmark-driven posture visibility
See posture through benchmark logic, severity, and compliance state.
Saner CSPM evaluates cloud services against named benchmark configurations rather than surfacing a raw list of disconnected findings. Teams can review the benchmark name, description, severity mix, compliance statistics, and control state from one posture view. That makes it easier to understand not just what failed, but how the environment is performing against a defined security standard. The result is posture insight that stays operationally useful during audit prep, routine review, and remediation planning.
Primary and quick evaluation benchmarks
Run broad baseline checks and faster targeted evaluations from the same model.
Saner CSPM supports both primary benchmarks and quick evaluation benchmarks. Primary benchmarks give teams a stable baseline for continuous posture monitoring, while quick evaluations support faster scans on selected areas or services during audits, validation work, or change review. The distinction matters because cloud posture programs need both breadth and speed. Teams should not have to choose between a full benchmark view and a focused posture check when the operational need changes.
Custom benchmark configuration
Shape posture policy around your environment, not just a default profile.
Saner CSPM supports guided benchmark creation, so teams can select a benchmark standard, choose regional or global application, assign it across accounts, and map the rules that matter to their operating model. The platform also keeps track of which benchmark is active, which one is primary, and how newly created or updated benchmarks replace or coexist with earlier configurations. That makes the posture layer more adaptable for enterprises that need to tune controls around internal policy rather than live inside one static preset.
Rule depth with manual and automated checks
Handle programmatic controls and human-reviewed controls in one framework.
Saner CSPM supports automated rules that run with default settings or configurable values, alongside manual rules that can be marked as audited or unaudited depending on review status. Users can also modify values, adjust severity, and tune rule behavior where the default configuration does not fully match the environment. This makes posture evaluation more credible because it reflects the way real cloud programs operate. Some controls can be scanned automatically. Others still need human validation, and the product accounts for both.
Compliance reporting with account and region context
Turn failed controls into audit-ready compliance evidence.
Saner CSPM structures findings around benchmark configuration, severity, compliance state, account, region, and affected resource so teams can build a clearer reporting trail. That makes it easier to explain which controls failed, where they failed, and how broadly the impact spreads. The output is already organized in a way that supports internal control reviews, recurring reporting, and external audit prep without forcing teams to rebuild the posture story from fragmented findings.
Trend visibility and drift monitoring
Track posture movement over time instead of reviewing it as a snapshot.
Saner CSPM uses date-wise affected resource trends to help teams identify recurring patterns, monitor the rise or reduction of non-compliant resources, and prepare for repeat problem areas before they spike again. This gives posture review a time dimension that many cloud teams lack. Instead of only seeing the current state, teams can see whether posture is stabilizing, drifting, or cycling back into the same control failures across review periods.
Global and service-specific control coverage
Know whether a control break is local, regional, or tied to a global service.
Saner CSPM distinguishes between regional and global benchmarks, which matters when services such as CloudFront are not tied to one region. Global checks are labeled accordingly, and the platform also provides supporting guidance on why a check matters and what action should follow. That helps teams interpret posture breaks more accurately, because a control issue on a global service should not be handled the same way as a regional configuration failure.
Multi-cloud posture coverage, including GCP
Apply the same posture discipline across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Saner CSPM extends posture management into GCP with benchmark checks for issues such as project-wide SSH key settings, publicly accessible Cloud Storage buckets, missing Cloud SQL backups, and unrestricted ICMP firewall rules. That adds real depth to the multi-cloud story. Teams can keep benchmark-driven posture work inside one operating layer instead of splitting AWS, Azure, and GCP control review into separate tools and reporting tracks.
Remediation linked to the original finding
Move from failed control to tracked fix without breaking the workflow.
Saner CSPM connects posture findings to remediation actions so teams can select resources, apply the relevant template, schedule the job, and follow execution status without losing the original benchmark context. This matters operationally because posture programs tend to break down when remediation evidence lives somewhere else. Keeping the finding, the action, and the outcome linked makes the workflow cleaner for engineers and far easier to explain during review.
